top of page

Creative Multifamily Financing Strategies for Real Estate Owners in a Bear Market



Borrowers now find themselves encountering stricter underwriting standards and more rigorous unwriting processes. Lenders are placing greater emphasis on creditworthiness and financial history, making it crucial for borrowers to have a strong credit profile. The scrutiny on income verification and debt-to-income ratios has intensified, adding to the complexity of obtaining financing.


Furthermore, lenders are being cautious about loan-to-value ratios and debt coverage tests. As we enter a period of potential recession fear, lenders are taking a more scrupulous view on potential decreases in rental income and occupancy rates, thereby further stressing cash flow projections. This increased scrutiny can make it challenging for owners of multifamily properties to meet the strict financial criteria set by lenders.


Given these current market conditions, multifamily property owners must navigate through the challenges by exploring alternative financing strategies. Creative financing options become increasingly important in order to overcome the limitations posed by traditional financing methods. By adopting innovative approaches and exploring various financing avenues, owners can find solutions that align with the current market dynamics and their specific needs.


TRADITIONAL FINANCING OPTIONS FROZEN


During the period of easy credit and favorable market conditions, multifamily property owners had access to a range of traditional financing options, including conventional loans, government-sponsored agency loans, and commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS). However, as the market shifted and entered into a fear based market, the impact of the previously easy credit environment is now being felt by owners seeking to refinance their properties. Traditionally, multifamily property owners have relied on a variety of financing sources to fund their investments. These sources include:


Conventional loans: Conventional loans were widely available during the period of easy credit. Borrowers could obtain financing from banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions based on the property's value and the borrower's creditworthiness.


Government-sponsored agency loans: Agencies such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac provided attractive loan options specifically tailored for multifamily properties. These loans offered competitive interest rates, flexible terms, and higher loan-to-value ratios, making them popular among owners seeking favorable financing.


Commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS): CMBS loans involved pooling numerous mortgage loans and selling them as a package to investors. These loans provided access to a broader range of capital sources, allowing owners to secure financing for larger multifamily properties.


These funding sources were great. 75%+ Leverage, 30 Year Amortization, Partial or Full Interest only Period. Life was good. Today, issues with that higher leverage capital structure are becoming apparent as multifamily property owners now face the challenge of refinancing their properties in the current market. The shift from easy credit to a more conservative lending environment underscores the importance of exploring alternative financing strategies and creative solutions to address the challenges faced by multifamily property owners solving the inherent funding Gap problem.


HOW TO BRIDGE TO FUNDING GAP


In the current market conditions, multifamily property owners are confronted with the challenge of bridging the funding gaps caused by the shift from easy credit to a more conservative lending environment. To address this issue, owners can explore alternative financing strategies that incorporate Mezzanine Financing, Preferred Equity, and Land Sale-Leaseback arrangements. These solutions, when combined with senior debt, can help reduce the equity gap and provide viable borrower solutions. Let's examine each option in detail:


Debts Funds: High octane, One-Stop Shopping


The Debt Funds have been picking up the slack where Banks, LifeCos, and agencies left off. While offered at a higher cost of capital, debt funds are a great options for providing Multifamily Bridge Loans to either recapitalize expiring debt or to quickly acquire a compelling Value-Add deal. Today, they are still able to reach 75% leverage levels and fund both existing assets and construction. Most are not DSCR constrained but more focused on value creation or land dollar in basis per unit. With new multifamily bridge lenders launching every quarter, it's important to understand the lending criteria's of each group and ensure that they have the appropriate back-office support to efficiently handle loan servicing post closing.


Mezzanine Financing: Enhancing Capital Stack Flexibility


Mezzanine Financing offers an effective way to bridge the funding gap by providing additional capital and enhancing the flexibility of the capital stack. Key considerations include:


Mezzanine Financing Overview: Mezzanine Financing involves securing junior debt from specialized lenders who are willing to take on higher-risk positions. This form of financing is typically subordinated to senior debt, meaning that it ranks lower in priority for repayment in case of default or foreclosure. Mezzanine lenders are compensated for the higher risk by charging higher interest rates and potentially receiving an equity stake or warrants.


Benefits of Mezzanine Financing:

  • Increased leverage without diluting ownership: Mezzanine Financing allows borrowers to access additional capital while retaining ownership control of the property.

  • Bridging the equity gap: By providing supplemental funds, Mezzanine Financing helps reduce the equity burden and increases the borrower's ability to meet funding requirements.

  • Flexible terms: Mezzanine lenders may offer higher loan-to-value ratios, extended loan maturities, and more lenient underwriting criteria, providing borrowers with greater flexibility in structuring their financing.

Coordination with with senior debt:

  • Subordination and interplay: Mezzanine lenders acknowledge their position as junior debt providers and work in coordination with senior lenders to ensure a smooth repayment hierarchy.

  • Impact on loan covenants: Borrowers must carefully consider how Mezzanine Financing affects existing senior debt covenants and ensure compliance with both sets of lenders' requirements.


Preferred Equity: Additional Capital without Dilution


Preferred Equity is another viable option to bridge the funding gap and secure additional capital without increasing the debt burden or diluting the equity.


Preferred Equity Overview:

Preferred Equity come from institutions who are willing to provide added capital subordinate capital in exchange for a preferred position in the property's cash flow and potential upside. Unlike common equity, Preferred Equity investors enjoy priority in distributions and potentially participate in profits before common equity holders. These groups are usually looking for a 12-14% Return on their capital.


Advantages of Preferred Equity:

  • Lower upfront costs: Preferred Equity allows borrowers to access additional capital without diluting ownership or incurring the same level of costs associated with acquiring common equity. Reduced debt burden: Preferred Equity provides an alternative to taking on more debt, enabling borrowers to lower their overall leverage and debt service requirements.

  • Flexible repayment terms: Preferred Equity investors may negotiate favorable terms such as priority in distributions and potentially participate in the property's appreciation.


Interaction with senior debt:

  • Subordination and intercreditor agreements: Preferred Equity investors typically acknowledge their position as subordinate to senior debt and enter into agreements that outline their rights and obligations.

  • Coordination with senior lenders: Borrowers must ensure effective communication and coordination between Preferred Equity investors and senior lenders to meet their respective requirements.


Land Sale-Leaseback Arrangements: Unlocking Property Value


Land Sale-Leaseback arrangements offer an innovative way to bridge the funding gap by monetizing the property's land value while retaining operational control. Consider the following:


Land Sale-Leaseback Overview:

Land Sale-Leaseback involves selling the property's land to an investor while simultaneously entering into a lease agreement to retain the right to occupy and operate the property. This arrangement enables property owners to access immediate capital by unlocking the value of the land.


Benefits of Land Sale-Leaseback:

  • Immediate access to capital: Land Sale-Leaseback allows owners to monetize the property's value and obtain a lump sum of cash that can be used to bridge the funding gap.

  • Operational control retention: Owners retain control over property operations, continuing to generate income from the property while benefiting from the injected capital.

  • Potential tax advantages: Depending on the structure and jurisdiction, land sale-leaseback transactions may offer tax benefits, such as the ability to depreciate the property and deduct lease payments.


Integration with senior debt:

  • Subordination and coordination: Land Sale-Leaseback arrangements require coordination between the lease terms and the requirements of senior debt lenders to ensure compliance and minimize potential conflicts.

  • Implications on loan underwriting: Lenders will consider the impact of the leaseback arrangement on property valuation, underwriting criteria, and loan terms.


By leveraging these financing tools, multifamily property owners can effectively bridge the funding gaps they face in today's market. It is essential for borrowers to carefully evaluate the specific terms and requirements of each option, as well as coordinate with senior lenders to ensure a viable and sustainable financing solution that aligns with their long-term objectives. These creative financing strategies provide valuable alternatives to traditional financing sources and allow owners to navigate the current market challenges successfully.


CONCLUSION


Multifamily property owners facing funding challenges in the current market can bridge the gaps by exploring alternative financing strategies. "Creative financing solutions are essential in today's tightened lending environment." says Joshua Emory, Managing Principal of Primrose Capital. "Options such as Mezzanine Financing, Preferred Equity, and Land Sale-Leaseback arrangements are simply tools in the tool bucket that can effectively reduce the equity gap and provide viable solutions when combined with senior debt". These innovative approaches offer flexibility, increased capital, and retained control over property operations.


Primrose Capital specializes in providing tailored financing solutions for multifamily property owners. Leveraging an experienced team of financiers, Primrose is navigating borrowers through all facets of the current capital markets climate.

Comments


bottom of page